VETS AT WAR
Ian M. Parsonson, AM
Australian Military History Publications, 2005. 224pp.
This is a book likely to appeal
only to specialists, either dedicated military historians, or veterinary
surgeons interested in a now obscure aspect of their profession. Both groups, unfortunately, are likely to
find that it offers thin gruel indeed.
For the military historians,
disappointment is likely to come from both the narrowness of focus – the
descriptions of the AIF on the Western Front, for example, are largely based on
the activities of the 5th Division – and the shallowness of the descriptions of
events in Sinai and Palestine. For
the veterinarians, apart for some graphic descriptions of various diseases of
horses, there seems to be little to expand their knowledge of their profession.
There are, perhaps, reasons for
these deficiencies. The
concentration on the activities of the 5th Division, for example, might be the
result of the DADVS of that Division, Max Henry, having left extensive written
records. Henry was also the
principal source for the period of World War I up to the 1916 reorganisation of
the AIF in Egypt, after Gallipoli, suggesting a dedication to keeping good
records. Perhaps his counterparts
in the other divisions were not so enthusiastic? Or maybe their records have gone astray?
In relation to the events in
Sinai and Palestine, the romance of the Light Horse, and the stirring tales of
Beersheba and other battles, mixed with the legends around T.E. Lawrence, may
have drawn the author towards those events, rather than to the more mundane
support provided by the Veterinary Corps.
For whatever reason, we are left with descriptions of battles that are
too sketchy for the dedicated historian, and details of the veterinary
activities that probably won’t satisfy the curious vet.
Perhaps, then, Mr Parsonson had
to ‘make do’ with what he could find, and stretch that as far as he could. In a slightly different context, he has
headed part of an Appendix ‘Other Veterinarians from Australia Who Served in
the Armed Services 1914-18’. Only
one of the persons mentioned was a vet before the war, the others received
their qualifications later. This
is stretching the definition a bit, for the sake of a page of text, suggesting
that the available sources are not particularly extensive!
While there is a bit more in the
descriptions of the Boer War, those of the Second World War and the periods
before and between the major wars are also unsatisfying.
The use of terminology is a source
of annoyance. Acronyms are
expanded inconsistently (DADVS is variously Deputy Assistant Director, or
Divisional Assistant Director, of Veterinary Services). MVS comes out as Mobile Veterinary
Section or Mobile Veterinary Service.
The reference to a ‘28th AVSE’ on page 92 is rather enigmatic, but from
context seems to be a garbled version of the 28th Company AASC, mentioned with
the 60th Battalion on pages 71 and 72.
Overall, while a history of the
Australian Army Veterinary Corps is a necessary addition to the body of
historiography of the Australian Army, this is not a high-grade book.
JOHN DONOVAN
No comments:
Post a Comment