THE HARD SLOG: Australians in
the Bougainville Campaign, 1944-45
Karl James
Cambridge University Press, 2012, 319pp
Karl James has written a
comprehensive account of the Bougainville campaign. Unlike some earlier
historians, he rejects the notion that this was an ‘unnecessary’ campaign,
arguing that Australian leaders of the period, unlike their later critics, did
not know that the war would end suddenly in August 1945. Rather, they expected
that it would continue into 1946, if not beyond, and that success in
Bougainville would release ‘manpower for future operations against Japan’, and
for the economy. However, some contemporary critics are not as easy to ignore,
including at least one brigadier serving on Bougainville (Hammer), and a
battalion commander who was relieved of his command for his negative attitude
to the campaign.
James’ account gives greater
detail of the operations on Bougainville than the Official History. A key
personality in the Bougainville operations was the commander of II Corps, Lieutenant-General
Stan Savige. His role as a moderating influence on his more enthusiastic
brigadiers is covered well, supplementing the work of Gavin Keating in The Right Man for the Right Job. Savige
was ably supported by Major-General Bill Bridgeford, commanding the 3rd
Division.
Interestingly, like some
other critics of the campaign, many Japanese thought that an offensive against
them would be pointless. Their commander, Lieutenant-General Hyakutake, thought
that a ‘slow, fanwise advance from Torokina’ would also be pointless, but this
was the technique used by Savige. Somewhat unusually, Savige wrote a pamphlet
on the Tactical and Administrative
Doctrine for Jungle Warfare, which was used as the basis for II Corps
orders and instructions.
One of its most interesting
aspects of this book is the coverage of the morale and disciplinary issues that
arose in the army after more than five years of war. Stress occurred at all
levels. Some junior officers and soldiers were at times reluctant to carry out
their duty, while a few experienced, but still relatively young, battalion
commanders found the strain of a sixth year of operations too much. They had to
be relieved of their commands, as did a brigadier, whose planning, judgement
and personality were considered inadequate. The brigade commander was replaced
by Noel Simpson, who had previously taken command of a battalion in similar
circumstances, and seems to have become the ‘turn to’ man for such problems.
The AIF-militia rivalry was
a constant background irritant during the campaign. The 55th/53rd Battalion,
with its chequered history of the failure of the 53rd Battalion on the Kokoda Trail,
responded with resentment towards the AIF, while Noel Simpson was not happy to
take command of a militia brigade. Despite this friction, the militia
battalions generally performed well, particularly when they had good leaders.
When leaders were inadequate, or tired, problems arose.
James describes the failed
landing at Porton Plantation well. He had noted earlier the deficiencies in
numbers of landing craft, and the failure at Porton illustrates well the
consequences of attempting too much with inadequate support. One key lesson of
the campaign must be the continuing need for combined arms operations.
Regrettably, Savige did not have an adequate range of supporting arms and
services.
By the end of the war the
Japanese forces were concentrated around Bonis in northern Bougainville, Kieta
Bay and Numa Numa Plantation on the east coast, and in southern Bougainville. The
2/8th Commando Squadron and native guerrillas organised by Allied Intelligence
Bureau parties operated away from the main lines of advance, where they
contributed significantly to the success of the campaign.
There are some minor
editorial quirks, such as mention of Gazelle Peninsula in a couple of places,
when presumably Gazelle Harbour was intended.
JOHN DONOVAN
No comments:
Post a Comment