TO KOKODA
Nicholas Anderson
Big Sky Publishing, 2014, 236pp,
$19.95
ISBN 978-1-9221322-95-6
Australian military history has enjoyed something of a
revival in recent years, and no doubt this will continue as the anniversaries
associated with the Centenary of the First World War occur. Within that
revival, some battles (Fromelles, but mainly around the time of the discovery
of the Pheasant Wood burials, most battles on the Western Front, Greece, Crete
and Syria, Alamein, the 1943-44 campaigns in New Guinea, and those in 1945 on
Borneo and Bougainville) receive only occasional attention. Some others,
notably Gallipoli, Tobruk and Kokoda, are regularly the subjects of books.
Nicholas Anderson has produced an informative history of the
campaign up until the recapture of Kokoda, with some useful summary judgements
on its place in the history of the war against Japan. The style of recent books
on Kokoda varies from popular ‘yarns’ to detailed academic studies. This book,
like others in the Australian Army Campaign Series, is academically rigorous,
but written and published in a highly readable style.
The descriptions of events during the Australian retreat and
subsequent advance are well written, enabling the reader to understand events
as they occurred. Anderson avoids the temptation to over-analyse events, which
led one recent author (Peter Williams, The
Kokoda Campaign 1942, Myth and Reality, CUP,
2012) to produce somewhat artificial estimates of the numbers engaged at
specific times.
Anderson’s account describes the logistic problems of
operating along a tenuous foot track, with air dropped supplies capable of
providing only a limited supplement to the work of Papuan carriers. As an
illustration of the difficulties of the Kokoda Trail, some wounded from the early
part of the Australian advance back across the mountains could not be evacuated
until weeks after the battle had moved on. These difficulties did not seem
always to be understood by senior officers in Port Moresby, leading to friction
between them and the commanders on the Trail.
Anderson’s summary of the significance of the campaign is
balanced. Kokoda did not save Australia from invasion, however, as Anderson
notes, the information available at the time suggested that a ‘Battle for
Australia’ was underway. There might not have been an actual Battle for
Australia, but it probably seemed at the time as if there was. That the
Japanese had already decided against invasion was recorded in Japanese archives
that were not then available to Australia’s intelligence authorities (but some
recent historians seem to ignore this reality).
Pre-war strategy held that the Singapore strategy would ensure Australia’s safety. In the event,
however, Australia’s security from invasion during the Second World War was
ensured by the maritime power of the United States Navy at the battles of the
Coral Sea and Midway, not by the Royal Navy operating from the Singapore base.
After those battles, the Japanese ability to land troops at Port Moresby was
minimal. This led to the Kokoda campaign, as the Japanese attempted an overland
advance.
As Anderson points out, Guadalcanal was more
important than Kokoda (or Milne Bay) because the Japanese made it so. Japanese
power could not support both campaigns, particularly if they gave priority to
holding Guadalcanal. They did this, easing the pressure on the Australian
forces on the Kokoda Trail. Success at Kokoda, however, did keep space between
the Japanese and the Australian mainland. The campaign also provided the
opportunity for the army to learn jungle-fighting skills, which were valuable
well beyond the end of the Second World War.
Anderson deals fairly with the relief of senior
officers during the campaign. Brigadier Potts lost his command in part because
under pressure he was insufficiently informative in his reports; he might have
been reinstated had Lieutenant General Rowell remained in command, but Rowell’s
successor Lieutenant General Herring would not accept Potts. The impact of his
sacking on the 21st Brigade was exacerbated by poorly worded (to put it
tactfully) speeches by Herring and General Blamey to the brigade at Koitaki,
implying that the troops had not fought bravely.
Rowell allowed his personal dislike of Blamey to
overcome his discipline, and was sacked; even lieutenant generals cannot
persistently be insubordinate! Major General Allen was replaced in large part
because of his poor relationship with Blamey and Herring. His successor, Major
General Vasey arrived just as the Japanese withdrew from Eora Creek, leaving the
way to Kokoda open. Vasey then gained the credit for Allen’s work.
Anderson sees the experiences of the individual soldiers
along the Kokoda Trail as the most significant legacy of the campaign. It is
invidious to select any one soldier to exemplify those who fought on the Kokoda
Trail, but Sergeant Bede Tongs of the 3rd (Militia) Battalion stands out.
On 17 October 1942, the 3rd Battalion was preparing to
attack strong Japanese positions at Templeton’s Crossing. Tongs identified a
Japanese machine gun post as a potential obstacle to the attack. He crawled
forward alone and threw a hand grenade into the post, destroying it. Tongs then
ran ‘like a Stawell Gift runner’ back to his platoon, where the company
commander ordered him to ‘Get that attack going Sergeant Tongs’ He then led his
platoon forward in their successful attack. Thousands of such young Australians
combined to win the campaign.
JOHN DONOVAN
No comments:
Post a Comment